Fix: missing graph resolution and community extraction in graphrag tasks (#7586)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Info of whether applying graph resolution and community extraction is
storage in `task["kb_parser_config"]`. However, previous code get
`graphrag_conf` from `task["parser_config"]`, making `with_resolution`
and `with_community` are always false.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
Two Case when local Es tag search has result which is filtered by score
1: Doc has empty tag,and not visi LLM
2: Code may use empty examples in Prompt for LLM search tag
Co-authored-by: huangfuqunze <huangfuqunze.hfqz@alibaba-inc.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
When parsing documents containing images, the current code uses a
single-threaded approach to call the VL model, resulting in extremely
slow parsing speed (e.g., parsing a Word document with dozens of images
takes over 20 minutes).
By switching to a multithreaded approach to call the VL model, the
parsing speed can be improved to an acceptable level.
### Type of change
- [x] Performance Improvement
---------
Co-authored-by: liuzhenghua-jk <liuzhenghua-jk@360shuke.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix the redis lock will always timeout (change the logic order release
lock first)
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
The lock is not released correctly when task_exectuor is abnormal
### Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
feat: Recover pending tasks while pod restart. (#7073)
### What problem does this PR solve?
If you deploy Ragflow using Kubernetes, the hostname will change during
a rolling update. This causes the consumer name of the task executor to
change, making it impossible to schedule tasks that were previously in a
pending state.
To address this, I introduced a recovery task that scans these pending
messages and re-publishes them, allowing the tasks to continue being
processed.
### Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
---------
Co-authored-by: liuzhenghua-jk <liuzhenghua-jk@360shuke.com>
fix(nursery): Fix Closure Trap Issues in Trio Concurrent Tasks (#7106)
## Problem Description
Multiple files in the RAGFlow project contain closure trap issues when
using lambda functions with `trio.open_nursery()`. This problem causes
concurrent tasks created in loops to reference the same variable,
resulting in all tasks processing the same data (the data from the last
iteration) rather than each task processing its corresponding data from
the loop.
## Issue Details
When using a `lambda` to create a closure function and passing it to
`nursery.start_soon()` within a loop, the lambda function captures a
reference to the loop variable rather than its value. For example:
```python
# Problematic code
async with trio.open_nursery() as nursery:
for d in docs:
nursery.start_soon(lambda: doc_keyword_extraction(chat_mdl, d, topn))
```
In this pattern, when concurrent tasks begin execution, `d` has already
become the value after the loop ends (typically the last element),
causing all tasks to use the same data.
## Fix Solution
Changed the way concurrent tasks are created with `nursery.start_soon()`
by leveraging Trio's API design to directly pass the function and its
arguments separately:
```python
# Fixed code
async with trio.open_nursery() as nursery:
for d in docs:
nursery.start_soon(doc_keyword_extraction, chat_mdl, d, topn)
```
This way, each task uses the parameter values at the time of the
function call, rather than references captured through closures.
## Fixed Files
Fixed closure traps in the following files:
1. `rag/svr/task_executor.py`: 3 fixes, involving document keyword
extraction, question generation, and tag processing
2. `rag/raptor.py`: 1 fix, involving document summarization
3. `graphrag/utils.py`: 2 fixes, involving graph node and edge
processing
4. `graphrag/entity_resolution.py`: 2 fixes, involving entity resolution
and graph node merging
5. `graphrag/general/mind_map_extractor.py`: 2 fixes, involving document
processing
6. `graphrag/general/extractor.py`: 3 fixes, involving content
processing and graph node/edge merging
7. `graphrag/general/community_reports_extractor.py`: 1 fix, involving
community report extraction
## Potential Impact
This fix resolves a serious concurrency issue that could have caused:
- Data processing errors (processing duplicate data)
- Performance degradation (all tasks working on the same data)
- Inconsistent results (some data not being processed)
After the fix, all concurrent tasks should correctly process their
respective data, improving system correctness and reliability.
### What problem does this PR solve?
Removed set_entity and set_relation to avoid accessing doc engine during
graph computation.
Introduced GraphChange to avoid writing unchanged chunks.
### Type of change
- [x] Performance Improvement
Fix: Add a basic example when the example of content_tagging is empty (#6276)
### What problem does this PR solve?
When using LLM for auto-tag, if there are no examples, the tag format
generated by LLM may be wrong. This will cause Elasticsearch insert
errors. Adding basic examples can avoid this problem.
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Fix:signal.SIGUSR1 and signal.SIGUSR2 can't use in window. so don't bind signal.SIGUSR1 and signal.SIGUSR2 in the windows env (#5941)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix:signal.SIGUSR1 and signal.SIGUSR2 can't use in window. so don't bind
signal.SIGUSR1 and signal.SIGUSR2 in the windows env
### Type of change
- [✓ ] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
Co-authored-by: tangyu <1@1.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
Refactored DocumentService.update_progress
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
close #5277 by make sure the file close
### Type of change
- [x] Performance Improvement
---------
Signed-off-by: yihong0618 <zouzou0208@gmail.com>
### What problem does this PR solve?
This patch add signal for ctrl + c that can exit the code friendly
cause code base use thread daemon can not exit friendly for being
started.
how to reproduce
1. docker-compose -f docker/docker-compose-base.yml up
2. other window `bash docker/launch_backend_service.sh`
3. stop 1 first
4. try to stop 2 then two thread can not exit which must use `kill pid`
This patch fix it
and should fix most the related issues in the `issues`
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Signed-off-by: yihong0618 <zouzou0208@gmail.com>
Run keyword_extraction, question_proposal, content_tagging in thread pool (#5376)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Run keyword_extraction, question_proposal, content_tagging in threads
### Type of change
- [x] Performance Improvement
### What problem does this PR solve?
Ignore the millisecond and microsecond value.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
Signed-off-by: jinhai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
Fix xinfo_groups returns unexpected result (#4026)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix xinfo_groups returns unexpected result. Close #3545
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Try to reuse existing chunks. Close #3793
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Rename page_num_list, top_list, position_list to page_num_int, top_int,
position_int
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
---------
Co-authored-by: Yingfeng <yingfeng.zhang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jin Hai <haijin.chn@gmail.com>
alkscr
hfrt456
liuzhenghua
Stephen Hu
benni82
aniaan
Zhichang Yu
Kevin Hu
zhou
Debug Doctor
donblack01
yihong
Jin Hai
so95